Thursday, December 29, 2011


date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:43:46 +0000
from: Phil Jones <>
subject: Fwd:

X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:35:02 -0500
To: Caspar Ammann <>, "Eugene R" <>,
Scott Rutherford <>,
Phil Jones <>
From: "Michael E. Mann" <>
X-UEA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-UEA-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-UEA-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Dear Caspar, Gene, Scott, Phil,
I am attaching a response I've drafted to the Moberg et al paper (attached for those of
you who haven't seen it). The message is pretty clear and simple--their method
overemphasizes the low-frequency variability. To demonstrate this, I've made use of
stuff from Mann and Jones, and from the Mann/Rutherford/Wahl/Ammann J. Climate letter on
Pseudoproxies. So I would welcome any of you to be co-authors on this--just let me now
if you're interested. I've been in touch w/ Keith (he and Tim are potentially working on
their own independent response--waiting to hear further).
This is a very rough draft, so comments much appreciated.
Looking forward to hearing back,
Professor Michael E. Mann
Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
e-mail: Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\MobergComment.doc" Attachment Converted:
"c:\eudora\attach\Figure110.pdf" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Figure36.pdf"
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\MobergetalNature05.pdf"

No comments:

Post a Comment