Thursday, January 19, 2012

2079.txt

date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:49:32 +0100
from: Tim Osborn <t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
subject: recent exchange in Science, Wahl et al, Storch et al
to: Eduardo Zorita <Eduardo.ZoritaatXYZxyzs.de>, gerd.buerger@mail.met.fu-berlin.de,Julie.JonesatXYZxyzs.de, cubaschatXYZxyzat.fu-berlin.de,simon.tettatXYZxyzoffice.gov.uk, philip.brohanatXYZxyzoffice.gov.uk,storchatXYZxyzs.de, Keith Briffa <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>,fidelgratXYZxyz.ucm.es

<x-flowed>
Thanks for the reprints of the comment/reply, Eduardo, which are
indeed interesting.

Did you already see the article just posted at realclimate.org which
discusses these papers (and also mentions Burger and Cubasch, 2005):

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/a-correction-with-repercussions/

Seems rather biased and the tone is certainly not constructive.

I really hope that the discussion of bias in reconstructions will
proceed in a much more constructive way at the PAGES/CLIVAR meeting
in Wengen in June, which will be attended by me, Keith, Eduardo and
some of the authors of this realclimate.org article. We will do our
best to ensure that it is constructive and good-spirited!

Cheers

Tim

Dr Timothy J Osborn
Climatic Research Unit
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

e-mail: t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk
phone: +44 1603 592089
fax: +44 1603 507784
web: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/
sunclock: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm

</x-flowed>

No comments:

Post a Comment