Thursday, January 19, 2012

2083.txt

date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:13 -0400
from: "Bamzai, Anjuli" <Anjuli.BamzaiatXYZxyzence.doe.gov>
subject: RE: Information on your DOE award
to: P.JonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk


I'll put 1995. If any different, let me know. Else no need to email.

Bean counting, bean counting ...sigh!

-----Original Message-----
From: P.JonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk [mailto:P.JonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:51 AM
To: Bamzai, Anjuli
Subject: RE: Information on your DOE award

Anjuli,
At home, so from memory. It has to be a multiple
of 3 years and after Tom Wigley left, so it must
be 1995.

Tom left in 1993 and the 1992 one would have had him
first.

Cheers
Phil


> When did it start with you as PI? I need that year for 1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: P.JonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk [mailto:P.JonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:46 AM
> To: Bamzai, Anjuli
> Subject: Re: Information on your DOE award
>
>
>
> Anjuli,
>
> 1. 2004 was the last renewal. It originally started though in 1979,

> but it was for Tom Wigley then. When the next renewal comes through
> it will be the 10th.
>
> 2. 1977
>
> Cheers
> Phil
>
>
>> Dear PI,
>>
>> For an upcoming Committee of Visitors of the program, I need the
>> following information:
>>
>> 1. Start year of your current award. If you've been on renewals, it
>> should be the year your DOE award first started. E.g. for SciDAC PIs
>> whose awards got renewed in 2004, the start year would be 2001.
>>
>> 2. Year you were granted your Ph.D.
>>
>> I can look it up each individual award in the hard copy files, but
>> thought an email from you may be the best way of collecting the info
>> efficiently. Please send me a 2 line response. If you are unsure of
>> 1., at least provide a response to 2.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Anjuli
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>


No comments:

Post a Comment