Monday, March 5, 2012

2370.txt

cc: <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>, "Brian Hoskins" <hoskins@met.reading.ac.uk>, <jean.jouzel@ipsl.jussieu.fr>
date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:23:24 -0000
from: "Mitchell, John FB \(Chief Scientist\)" <john.f.mitchellatXYZxyzoffice.gov.uk>
subject: FW: IPCC Review Editors report.
to: <wg1-ar4-re-bouncesatXYZxyzs.ucar.edu>, "Susan Solomon" <Susan.SolomonatXYZxyza.gov>, <rchrist@wmo.int>

Susan

I have received the following letter from David Holland, who has links with Stephen
McIntyre and his Climate Audint website, on the review process for chapter 6 of AR4 . I
have discussed this briefly with Jean and we do not think there is an issue. However,
given the wider nature of the questions, I think it would be more appropriate for any
response to come through IPCC rather than me as an individual.I will wait to hear from IPCC
before I respond. I am in Exeter for the first three days of next week (+44 1392 884604) if
you want to discuss this further.

I understand Brian has received a similar enquiry, hence I have included his name on the
copy list.

John

Professor John Mitchell OBE FRS Chief Scientist,
Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter EX1 3PB United Kingdom
Tel. +44(0)1392884604 Fax:+44 (0) 870 9005050
E-mail: john.f.mitchellatXYZxyzoffice.gov.uk [1]http://www.metoffice.gov.uk


______________________________________________________________________________________

From: David Holland [mailto:d.hollandatXYZxyzco.net]
Sent: 22 February 2008 15:50
To: Mitchell, John FB (Chief Scientist)
Subject: Re: IPCC Review Editors report.

Dear Dr Mitchell,


Thank you for your reply. In the light of it I hope you might be able to answer the more
detailed questions in the attached letter.


David Holland

----- Original Message -----

From: [2]Mitchell, John FB (Chief Scientist)

To: [3]David Holland

Cc: [4]Mitchell, John FB (Chief Scientist)

Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:34 PM

Subject: RE: IPCC Review Editors report.

Dear Mr Holland


I can confirm that you have had the complete Review Editors report and that there was no
supplemental information submitted with the Review Editors report


I hope this answers your enquiry.


John Mitchell
______________________________________________________________________________________

From: David Holland [mailto:d.hollandatXYZxyzco.net]
Sent: 31 January 2008 18:04
To: Mitchell, John FB (Chief Scientist)
Subject: Re: IPCC Review Editors report.

Dear Dr Mitchell,


WGI TSU have now kindly sent me a copy of your Review Editor's Report and I attach a copy.


Clair Hanson from your office, on behalf of WGII TSU has kindly sent me all the WGII
reports and many of them provide substantial additional information.


Can you confirm that the attached is the complete report or let me have a copy of any
supplemental information?


Thanking you in advance,


David Holland

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\CH6RevQs.pdf"

No comments:

Post a Comment