Sunday, April 8, 2012

3182.txt

date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:05:31 +0100
from: Tim Osborn <t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
subject: Section 6.5 FOD bullets
to: Jonathan Overpeck <jto@u.arizona.edu>,Keith Briffa <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>, Eystein Jansen <eystein.jansenatXYZxyz.uib.no>, �yvind Paasche <oyvind.paascheatXYZxyzrknes.uib.no>

<x-flowed>
Dear all,

here are the revised bullet points relating to section 6.5. We've gone
through them in some detail with attention to precise wording changes and
also given separate conclusions for the last 500, 1000 and 2000 year
periods as suggested by Peck - including a "very likely" statement for the
last 500 years. We've also re-ordered them a little to given a more
obvious structure.

Cheers

Keith and Tim

</x-flowed>

Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\09aug05_Ch06_FOD_BULLETS_text.doc"
<x-flowed>
Dr Timothy J Osborn
Climatic Research Unit
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

e-mail: t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk
phone: +44 1603 592089
fax: +44 1603 507784
web: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/
sunclock: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm
</x-flowed>

No comments:

Post a Comment