Saturday, April 14, 2012


cc: Caspar Ammann <>, Ben Santer <>
date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:46:24 +0100
from: Sarah Raper <>
subject: Re: responses
to: Tom Wigley <>

Dear Tom,

I have reread the ms and all responses and am impressed/amused by them.
Very good. I am not so close to this and like the paper more with each
read - I think the additions do help. Only one trivial comment - page
15 para starting 'From the maximum..' Ist line 'the implied
sensitivities are:' add climate to read 'the implied climate
sensitivities are;'

Hopefully Robock is happy with the 3 reviews - ie won't send it out

Many thanks for all your work.


On 26 Oct 2004, at 06:23, Tom Wigley wrote:

> <RobockComments.doc>

No comments:

Post a Comment