cc: joos <joosatXYZxyzmate.unibe.ch>, Eystein Jansen <eystein.jansenatXYZxyz.uib.no>, email@example.com, Keith Briffa <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:53:26 +0100
from: Stefan Rahmstorf <rahmstorfatXYZxyzan-klima.de>
subject: Re: Fwd: some figures at last!
to: Jonathan Overpeck <jtoatXYZxyzrizona.edu>
at first sight the figures look great. Am at home today but will look at
them again tomorrow.
Does the instrumental record go up to, including 2005? (Perhaps in the
final version of the report it can even include the 2006 value?)
I vote for keeping the EMIC panel. We now have sent the data for
CLIMBER-3alpha, i.e. with 3D ocean GCM, which can also be included here.
I propose Fortunat should draft the caption as he has worked a lot more
on this than me (near zero), so he knows much better what the key points
to mention in the caption are. O.k with you Fortunat?