Friday, May 11, 2012


date: Fri May 2 11:47:01 2008
from: Tim Osborn <>
subject: Re: WET dataset(s)
to: Ian Harris <>

harry - the wetsyn netCDF file seems full of crap! stripey like when you previously
combined 0.5 normals with 2.5 anomalies, though somehow much worse! No variability in Jan
or Apr, stripey in Jul and Oct.
At 10:16 02/05/2008, you wrote:

I've made a complete run of half-degree synthetic-only WET to be used
with the observed + 2.5-degree synthetic WET as follows:
Option 1: No obs after 1989
Use 1901-1989 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/ wet/wet_final/
Use 1990-2006 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/
(if you'd like single files for each period let me know)
Option 2: synthetic only
Use all files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/wet/ wet_final_synthetic/
Ian "Harry" Harris
Climatic Research Unit
School of Environmental Sciences
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom

No comments:

Post a Comment