Thursday, May 17, 2012

4353.txt

date: 18 Aug 2008 12:39:50 -0400
from: Gavin Schmidt <gschmidtatXYZxyzs.nasa.gov>
subject: Re: Revised version the Wengen paper
to: Phil Jones <p.jonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk>

a couple of quick points - more later.

- why does the CET line on figure A1 only go to 1950? Surely you have
enough data to go to 1982 with no padding? I think that it is important
to graphically show that even if you take IPCC90 at face value, it still
shows that today is warmer. The graph will be looked at much more often
than the text will be read.

- I was talking to Ben Cook recently, and he was describing some tree
species in Vietnam and Thailand that clearly had annual rings and that
they were in the process of cross-validating the dating. In general, he
was pretty optimistic about the prospects for tropical dendro. Thus in
the response to reviewers and maybe the text, we should be quite open to
this.

Gavin


On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 06:00, Phil Jones wrote:
> Dear All,
> Here's the revised version of the paper, together with the
> responses to the reviewers.
> We have told John Matthews, that we will get this back to him by
> the beginning
> of next week. To us in the UK this means Aug 26/27 as next Monday
> is a national
> holiday. So, to those not away at the moment, can you look through your
> parts and get any comments back to us by the end of this week or over the
> weekend?
> Can you also look at the references - those in yellow and let me know of
> any that have come out, or are able to correct those that I think just look
> wrong?
> I hope you'll think of this as an improvement.
>
> Cheers
> Phil
>
>
> Prof. Phil Jones
> Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
> School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
> University of East Anglia
> Norwich Email p.jonesatXYZxyz.ac.uk
> NR4 7TJ
> UK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment