Monday, May 21, 2012

4529.txt

date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:46:29 -0000
from: "Rob Wilson" <rob.wilsonatXYZxyzac.uk>
subject: Re: Emailing: Info for Keith
to: "Keith Briffa" <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>

Morning Keith,

no problem

As I said, I want to play around with shorter published reconstructions that show no
divergence at the local scale and see what an alternative NH recon might look like. I have
a feeling that the resultant independent series will still show a divergence against NH
temps.

That begs the question "why cant we model recent warming at large scales?"



will keep you posted with my play although it might be several weeks as I have other
priorities

Rob

----- Original Message -----

From: [1]Keith Briffa

To: [2]Rob Wilson

Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:19 AM

Subject: Re: Emailing: Info for Keith

Thanks Rob
I need to digest these - but I am in no way trying to trash anything
- just trying to be ready for the "misguided" onslaught that will
follow the IPCC Chapter (and possibly US Academy's Committee
outcome). I will get back in touch when we decide where to go. Thanks
again
Keith
At 15:50 14/03/2006, you wrote:
>Hi Keith,
>here's the info you asked for.
>I did this in a bit of a rush so I hope it is understandable.
>
>I hope you don't use this information to trash our JGR paper.
>Gordon and Rosanne would kill me.
>
>Rob
>PS. all figure are in temperature anomalies except the last one
>which is in normalised standard deviations.
--
Professor Keith Briffa,
Climatic Research Unit
University of East Anglia
Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K.
Phone: +44-1603-593909
Fax: +44-1603-507784
[3]http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/briffa/

No comments:

Post a Comment