Wednesday, May 23, 2012


date: Fri Jul 8 10:31:25 2005
from: Phil Jones <>
subject: Other figures and other recent emails
to: Kevin Trenberth <>


The earlier emails have dealt with figures from 3.2, 3.3, 3.5 and 3.8. The only query
with any of these relates to 3.5.1. Did Dennis do this, so the 20 rather than 10m
contour can be easily dealt with when he's back? Or should an email go to Jim?
Figures for 3.4 and 3.6 look good. A few responses though to yours
Fig 3.6.2 OK.
On 3.6.1, Jim's colouring makes it clearer than the alternative above.

Figure 3.7.1 Needs units added to caption (mm/day?). How's about trying
a plot just for 45N to 45S, or even 30S? Still have a hard time knowing
what this figure means?
Fig 3.7.5 Matilde said Marengo couldn't update this. This is I believe because
it is based on Hulme, which we've not updated. We no longer get that journal.
I'll email Matilde to see if she can get the regions defined. If it is from our data,
then I've not much confidence in the NAR part.
Forgot to mention to DE about 3.8.5.
On the CQs, as PDSI is now in 3.3 (i.e. not in the extremes section), the PDSI
figures should stay in CQ3.3. Hopefully we will get a better plot from Lisa to
replace the Groisman plot.
I'm attaching an updated version of Fig 3.8.6 (JJA temps for Central Europe). New
one has 2004 on.
I propose we just put the TAR 3.9 figures in as placeholders for the FOD.
Have you incorporated all the changes to references (some deletions) that Fatima
has sent, and also David's couple of small emils. I can do this at the weekend
if not?
I will now have a tea and then start on reading the current draft.

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email

No comments:

Post a Comment