Thursday, June 7, 2012

4930.txt

date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:14:19 +0100
from: "Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)" <David.PalmeratXYZxyz.ac.uk>
subject: RE: FOI appeal status
to: "Osborn Timothy Dr (ENV)" <T.OsbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk>

Tim,
They need to see 'everything' in order to determine that we are actually exempting what we should (so, for example, folks don't exempt information that clearly isn't personal). They have the same restrictions as us and none of the names will be passed on to anyone. We also claimed confidentiality over all that we submitted so that under FOIA, there is also a section 41 ground for non-disclosure.

Trying to pull it all together today for Jonathan....

Cheers, Dave

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk]
>Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 11:11 AM
>To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)
>Subject: RE: FOI appeal status
>
>Dave,
>
>I've looked through about half of it now, all of it looks spot on (to
>my untrained eye) and I'm now finishing off the rest. One thing that
>came to mind as I'm just reading justification for "Section 40"
>personal information exemption... in the sample of emails I sent
>you, which will be included in the submission to ICO, will you be
>redacting all the names and any other personal information? Or is it
>supplied to ICO on the basis that if they will redact such personal
>information if necessary?
>
>Thanks
>
>Tim
>
>At 14:30 13/08/2009, you wrote:
>>Tim,
>>Only version is that which went around earlier - I am amending it
>>this week as it's 'due' tomorrow!
>>However, I phoned the ICO and they are fairly relaxed about
>>deadlines as long as the information is coming in.... The 'real'
>>deadline is that I'm on hols as of tomorrow but I fear I will have
>>to come in to finish this work off.....
>>
>>Cheers, Dave
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk]
>> >Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:20 AM
>> >To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)
>> >Cc: Osborn Timothy Dr (ENV)
>> >Subject: FOI appeal status
>> >
>> >Dear Dave,
>> >
>> >sorry I've still not responded further re. the draft
>> >documentation you've
>> >put together for the David Holland FOI appeal.
>> >
>> >What is the status/timing of this? Am I too late to
>> >contribute, or has it
>> >not yet left your desk? If I'm not too late, then please could you
>> >re-send the last version (or more recent, if it's changed) and
>> >I'll look
>> >today.
>> >
>> >Thanks and sorry again for my earlier lack of response,
>> >
>> >Tim
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Dr. Tim Osborn
>> >RCUK Academic Fellow
>> >Climatic Research Unit
>> >School of Environmental Sciences
>> >University of East Anglia
>> >Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
>> >www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>Dr Timothy J Osborn, Academic Fellow
>Climatic Research Unit
>School of Environmental Sciences
>University of East Anglia
>Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
>
>e-mail: t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk
>phone: +44 1603 592089
>fax: +44 1603 507784
>web: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/
>sunclock: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm
>
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment